Conclusion

The basis for quantum mechanics is the recognition that everything has a wavelike nature, even those things we normally consider particles. By the same token, those things that we usually consider waves (e.g., light) also have a particle nature.

In conclusion of our study of the First and Second Day of Creation, we have learn the role the Four Fundamental Forces of Nature played in both the creation of matter and anti-matter, and the evolution of four of the seven senses of man. It should be now crystal clear that electromagnetic force was the first of the fundameantal forces to develop when God electromagnetically recalled all the thought energy that had been scattered throughout the universe. However, in electromagnetism, like charges repel each other. Therefore, without a strong force of nuclear attraction, two proton could not exist in the same nucleus to form atoms without flying apart. Thus the universe then became consciously aware of the strong force of nuclear attraction that existed within the tiny black holes scattered throughout the universe. These tiny black hole functioned like miniature but very deep space warps that empowered the Mind of God to be omnipresent and omnibus throughout the entire unverse no matter how large or how small it was preceived to be. These space warps also produced time warps that empowered the Mind of God to overcome the perception on linear time and space—theoretically creating hyperspace. Thereafter, all waves that entered into the event horizon of these deep space warps cease to travel in a linear motion and entered into a spin, and thereby took on the behavior and characteristic of particles and anti-particles. This process transformed the oscillation of a wave into the oscillation of a particle. In other words, it transformed the alternating frequency of waves along a linear line to the vibratory frequency of a particles within a certain contrtolled space or controlled orbit.

In Genesis 1:2, these deep space warps are described as the face of the deep. The waves that moved over them are described as the Spirit of God (the thoughts and thought energy of God) moving upon the face of the waters, as in waves of water. Heru described these deep space warps as the watery abyss of Creation called Nu, who reperesented the fathering behavior of the strong nuclear force of attraction therein.

Once all the thoughts of God were coded by the colors and anti-colors carried by quarks and anti-quarks, and sealed in memory by the creation of the neutron, the universe became consciously aware of the need to radiate the store knowledge throughout itself as life and intelligence—giving everything a purpose, reason for existing. Thus the universe also became consciously aware of the weak nuclear force associated with radiation.

Finally strong gravitational forces were produced that employed the other three fundamental forces of nature to produce heavier and heavier atoms and chemical elements in a gravitationly controlled space. This is essential to perpetuating and sustaining both life and intelligence in a physical and natural existence.

However, we have thus far said little or nothing about gravity, or any waves or particels known to carry the gravitional force. Therefore, in our Conclusion, we will take a brief look at gravity and the possible existence of quantum gravity, and a particle that would contain or mediate its quanta of energy.

In modern physics theories, forces are carried by particles. An example is the photon, a massless particle that carries the force of electromagnetism. The graviton is the name given to the particle that would carry the force of gravity. It has never been detected, but is required if gravity is to be understood in the same way as the other fundamental forces. This way of thinking about the nature of gravity is different from the geometrical description in Einstein's general relativity. The two points of view are not necessarily incompatible, but reconciling them (in detail) will require a more complete theory of gravity.

As we will see, reconciling a theory of quantum gravity with Einstein's geometrical description of gravity will also reconcile the quantum mechancis' version of Spin with the classical mechanics' version of Spin. 5   It is all about understanding what the Mind of God was thinking about and what it was trying to accomplish that caused both a classical Mechanics version and and quantum mechanics version of gravity and spin to exist. Both the case of gravity and the case of spin developed as a result of the Mind of God working to overcome the preception of time and space necessary to become Omnipresent and Omnibus, as well as to remain Omnisceince. Remember, the energy of God's thoughts traveled in oscillating waves on a linear line in to infinity—creating the perception of time and space. Thus we will see how drawing a wave out of inifinity through sending it into a at some point along its linear line to behave as a particle rotating upon an axis, as see in Classical Mechanics, is the same as intrinsic Angular Momentum 5   assocaited with spin in quantum mechanics.

We begin with taking a very brief look at a view of the beginning Creation known as Planck epoch. During this time the universe was sufficiently dense and energetic that all the fundamental forces, including gravity, were merged into one grand force. Quantum mechanics is generally associated only with the world of the very small, but during the Planck epoch the entire observable universe was tiny. Under such conditions, quantum mechanics and gravity must merge into quantum gravity. Unfortunately, at this time physicists do not have a theory of quantum gravity. So we speculate on what such a theory might be like, and what it might tell us.

To develop a theory of quantum gravity, we must take a second look at the student in a class, wherein the minds students are bombarded with information transmitted from the mind of that teacher. Rememeber, the waves carrying God's thoughts in the form of thought energy were sent into a spin in efforts to organize those thoughts and energy while committing it all to memory. Likewise, the mind of the student was also sent into a spin in an effort to organize the information transmitted from the mind of the teacher while committing to memory as much as possible. However, there was something else that occurred before the student's mind was sent into a spend. The first thing to occur involves the information transmitted by the mind of the teacher gravitating towards the mind of the student. As in the meeting of two minds, we therein have two dimensions being drawn to a single point of interest: the dimension of the teacher and all the other dimensions therein, and the dimension of the student and all the dimensions therein also. Though this help to close the gap between the mind of the teacher and the mind of teacher produced by the preception of space between the two, it does not the gap produced by the preception of time. Because the transmission of this information does not occur at once, but rather over a period of time that constitute the span of the lecture, the information gravitates towards the student in quanta of information. Once all the quanta of information are absorbed by the student, the gap created by the perception of time is also closed. This quanta of infomation is analogous to our graviton, and the basis for developing a theory of quantum gravity.

The reason why gravitons have been impossible to detect by quantum physicists thus far probably has to do with the fact that they are so deeply embedded in the electromagnetic force, and that they have no spin, nor any angular monentum. However, they too transform the oscillating frequency of a wave into the vibratory frequency of a particle in a contolled space. Some waves moved upon the face of the deep space warps at angle, or diagonally across an imaginary line laid across the face thereof. These are the waves that entered into a spin to behave like a particle drawing the particle out of infinity. This angular entry into these space warps is the primeval basis for the theories of angular momentum known today. Remember, gravitons are deeply embedded in the electromagnetic force. Therefore, to fully understand the graviton, we such have basic understanding of an electromagnetic wave (or electromagnetic radiation) with regard to it moving along a linear line. Electromagnetic radiation is a combination of oscillating electric and magnetic fields moving through a medium perpendicular to each other through space and carring energy from one place to another. Therefore, when a an electromagnetic wave passed across a space warps parallel to the imaginary live laid across it face, the perpendicular electromagnetic field collapse into the wave itself to form a graviton.

As a former electrician, I once had an experience that should make all this just a little be easier to understand. While working on some 277 volts lighting, I grabbed hold of a hot wire with one hand, and held on to the metal grid in a susoended ceiling with the other hand. What frighten me even more that the electrical shock was the fact that it took quite some effort to pull my hand away from the hot wire. That was do to the fact that my hand had entered into a strong electromagnetic field, when had a propensity for drawing a human body into it—when strong enough and close enough. Now try to imagine the exist of such a force that is independent of the model in classical mechanics, wherein like charges repel and unlike charges attract. If you can imagine that, then you have imagined the force of a graviton. When the electromagnetic field begins to collapse into the electromagnetic wave, the oscillation of the wave between a positive and negative charge is ultimately neutralized—leaving behind a strong force of nuclear attraction, or a particle that contains or exerts such a force.

Figure C provides us with a rather crude picture of how an electromagnetic wave, traveling parallel to an imaginary line laid across the face of a miniature space warps, is drawn into one of the tiny black holes to form a graviton. Here we must remember that, as the electromagnetic wave traveled along a linear line, an electromagnetic field travels with it along perpendicular line. Thereby the phenomenon of the electromagnetic wave being draw into a tiny black hole causes the electromagnetic field to collapse into the electromagnetic wave itself—thus producing the graviton. The collapse to the electromagnetic field can be interpreted as the absorption of quanta of energy by the electromagnetic wave, or the graviton itself. Thus the value of the absorption of quanta of energy can be calculated from the point of origin to any point down the perpendicular line as it descends down the tiny black hole—the point origin being the point at which the electromagnetic field began to collapse into the electromagnetic wave. Therefore, a graviton is an accumulative value. That is the basis for developing a theory of quantum gravity and reconcilling it to the geometrical description of gravity in Einstein's general relativity. Therein, it should be made crystal clear how both gravitons and gravity analogously employed the other other three fundamental forces of nature to create the physical and natural universe as it is now seen. When we consider the fact that a graviton is an accumulative value, analogous to the accumulation of particles or atoms to produce a mass heavy enough to exert a gravitational pull on smaller mass, the reconciliation shouldn't be too difficult.

There is something else we should consider about the graviton and it relationship with a space warp. It has long been theorized that a space warp also produces a time warp that overcomes the limitations of the speed of light. The existence of such a phenomenon would be highly consistent with the Will of God to overcome the preception of time and space in order to be Omnipresent and Omnibus. Remember, electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light. Now let us consider the fact that a graviton is formed by electromagnetic waves being drawn to a point of singularity from opposite ends of infinity at the same time. Thus we can be relatively certain that the effective speed of the movement of this energy along a linear line is some multiple of the of the speed of light—maybe even as fast as the speed of light squared. I'm sure some of the great mathematicians will figure it out. Meanwhile, there is something else we can't be too sure at this point. We can't be sure if this energy is stored in atoms or the graviton itself as potential, of around the graviton and/or it vibratory frequency as kinetic energy. Now that they know where to look and what to look for, I'm sure some of the great quantum physicists of ourt day will figure that out also. Finally we must remember Planck epoch, the time when the universe was sufficiently dense and energetic that all the fundamental forces, including gravity, were merged into one grand force. Well now we can be relatively certain that the graviton was the catalyst for the great merger of the fundamental forces of nature.

Dr. Malachi Z. York
 

“Nigger” redressed

Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.

The Greek word used for Niger [Strong’s Concordance #3526] is neeg-er, meaning black. The Greek as found in Matthew 5:36, to describe the color of a person’s hair is not neger, but melas “black.”

Some of the terms that I will use in talking about the topic of whether or not there is evidence for black people in the Bible are terms that have been used by historians, ethnologists and Bible commentators of years past. Perhaps they’re not the terms we would like to use today. But they are terms that have been used historically. Terms such as Caucasian, Caucasoid, Oriental, Negro, Black, Hamitic. These terms have been used in an effort to differentiate between various Euro-American ideas of the origin of blacks.

  And the ideas of these mostly Old Testament scholars from the 18th, 19th and even into the 20th century, particularly in Europe and some in America, have been used in an attempt to biblically justify black slavery and the subjugation of black peoples. I know when I first read these things they brought tears to my eyes and caused me anguish. But as a white person in a white country it also gave me a better understanding of and a greater appreciation for the black experience in the United States of America.

I’ve given you the background for this discussion. My purpose has to do with the fact that European artists and Bible commentators of the past several centuries have painted and described all biblical characters as white, even God. In European paintings, in European theological writings, God is white and so is everyone else. It is sometimes difficult for people of color even to identify with the Christian Bible because, according to some scholars, there are no black people mentioned.

What does the Bible have to do with people of color? Is it a book by a white God for his special white people? In fact, this line of reasoning, that there are no black people mentioned in the Bible, has formed the basis for an argument of exclusion of blacks and the justification of slavery in the United States during the 1800s. OUR purpose is to present evidence of the black presence in the Bible and to demonstrate that God’s Word involves, concerns, and speaks to all people.

WE going to prove that there is a black presence in the Bible.  WE realize that it’s extremely difficult to deal with the subject of a black presence in the Bible since European translators have plagiarized and changed words around in the Bible.

We have a traditional view, which has been influenced by ancient rabbinical interpretations. These interpretations sometimes take precedence over the text being interpreted. So, when rabbis interpret certain Old Testament texts as referring to people of color or black people, some scholars have said, How can we trust rabbinical tradition? We know that rabbinical tradition is not always accurate. We know that they use a highly interpretative hermeneutic called ‘midrash.’ How can we be sure that when rabbis say black, rabbis mean black the way we think of black? How can we know? Does rabbinical literature when it mentions black people mean Black people or does it mean people of generally darker skin? Do they mean something else and is that only a tradition?

Language is the KEY. Stop looking at the Bible in just the English Language! The Master Teacher, Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York tells us to learn to look at the Bible in the Languages it was first revealed in, namely Hebrew and Greek.  Hebrew is the language of the Torah or Old Testament and Greek is the Language of the Injil or New Testament.

     In most cases the Hebrew Names of certain peoples or tribes also denote what race or ethnic Group they come from.  For example, here are some ancient names. These names are significance of the color attributed to the Hamites in the table of nations, that’s in:

(1).  Genesis 10:6-14 (King James Version)

 “And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan.

 And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtechah: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.

 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.

 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.

 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.

 Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,

 And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city.

 And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,

 And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim.”

(2). 1 Chronicles 1:8-16 (New International Version)

 8 The sons of Ham:
       Cush, Mizraim, ^[a] Put and Canaan.

 9 The sons of Cush:
       Seba, Havilah, Sabta, Raamah and Sabteca.
      The sons of Raamah:
       Sheba and Dedan.

 10 Cush was the father ^[b] of
       Nimrod, who grew to be a mighty warrior on earth.

 11 Mizraim was the father of
       the Ludites, Anamites, Lehabites, Naphtuhites, 12 Pathrusites, Casluhites (from whom the Philistines came) and Caphtorites.

 13 Canaan was the father of
       Sidon his firstborn, ^[c] and of the Hittites, 14 Jebusites, Amorites, Girgashites, 15 Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, 16 Arvadites, Zemarites and Hamathites. The Semites

 Now the words used among the list of peoples descended from Ham are in some ways in the Hebrew, Arcadian, Sumerian languages related to the color black. But what does this mean? Knowing ancient customs, it could be argued that people in ancient times were called what they were and you have many of the descendants of Ham being identified with terminology and words that would be translated as black. What does this mean?

(a). HAM:=” Warm, hot, and hence the south; also an Egyptian word meaning "black", the youngest son of Noah ( Gen 5:32; Gen 9:22,24). The curse pronounced by Noah against Ham, properly against Canaan his fourth son, was accomplished when the Jews subsequently exterminated the Canaanites.”

(b). 3569 KUWSHIY:= koo-shee' patronymically from 3568; a Cushite, or descendant of Cush:--Cushi, Cushite, Ethiopian(-s). BLACK

(c). = MIZRAIM: a Black son of HAM. Today a name of Egypt, a country at the northeastern section of Africa, adjacent to Palestine, and through which the Nile flows.

In ancient times Our Ancestors were given names that pretty much reflected our character or who We were or what We were, how We appeared. But when you translate our names out of Our Language into another Language, then our identity and it’s meaning is lost.

    We  also have the testimonies of ancient Hebrew, Greco-Roman and early Christian writers with respect to the color of the ancient Egyptians and Ethiopians. Now some ancient Hebrew writers, some Greco-Roman, and these early Christian writers say that the Egyptians and Ethiopians were black. These scholars  admit they were black?

  There is sufficient evidence and data available which proves that the Prophets and peoples mentioned in the Bible were indeed black! .  We can prove this based on the evidence and data available and hope to make a very powerful, persuasive, and cogent argument to American Blacks Under the Spell of Euro-American misinterpretation of the Bible due to poor translations of the King James Version Of The bible..

Are all Black people literally black? Are they Negroid in physical appearance, that is in anthropological and physiological definition?  And a indepth study and investigation will prove through artifacts and Research that  the Peoples of the Bible were indeed BLACK! Some would say some Negroes are much fairer in skin color than some Caucasians. And undoubtedly that’s true. There are also socio-legal definitions of black Negro based on the percentage of African or Negro blood someone has in their ancestry. Now you may think that sounds preposterous but up until not long ago there were certain states that had laws that stated that someone was a Negro if they had as much as one drop of Negro blood. Their physical appearance did not matter. You begin to realize some of the difficulties of trying to say who are black people. Because when you try to identify black people in the pages of the Bible, you will find white people wanting to argue about what’s black.

Blacks, authentic Israelites

By Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York

“Nobody had the right to start a church after Jesus left. They gathered in synagogues then, and still should now. We Negroes, Africans, are not gentiles like Paul and Luke – we are the once lost but now found (through DNA testing and the Y-chromosome which has been found all over Africa). First look up Black Jews then Lemba and see who we are – God’s chosen people! Israel, that’s us!

CHECK OUT THIS EVIDENCE!

The Lemba of Southern Africa

"We came from Sena, we crossed Pusela, we rebuilt Sena. In Sena they died like flies. We came from Hundji, to Chilimani. From Chilimani to Wedza. The tribes went to Zimbabwe. They built the walls and lived on the hill. Mwali sent the star. From Zimbabwe to Mberengwe. From Mberengwe to Dumghe. We carried the drum. We came to Venda, Solomon led us. Baramina was our ancestor."

-- Ndinda Song

The Lemba are a paradoxical population of tens of thousands of self-proclaimed Jews who live in mostly in Malawi, Zimbabwe and the South African region of Venda. Their tribal lore, as told through the above "Ndinda song" which some Lemba sing during funerals and harvest festivals, is extensive, muddled and complex. "We came from Sena," they claim, though none of them can say exactly where Sena is. Is it a town in Israel north of Jericho, as some Lemba claim? Is it a region of Yemen, as some ethnographers suggest, or a village on the Zambesi River in Mozambique, as British explorer and Orientalist Tudor Parfitt, who lived with the Lemba for six months to try to determine their true origin, believes? According to tribal lore, the Lemba are descendants of attendants of the Israelite King Solomon who traveled to Ophir (Zimbabwe) in search of gold. The Lemba allege that when Solomon returned, some of his men remained, teaching the Africans to worship "Mwali," a single God and spreading their traditions throughout the region. Are the Lemba direct descendants of Jews from King Solomon’s court? Are they Africans who developed seemingly Judaic practices through contact with Muslim and Christian proselytizers? 

What is certain is that the Lemba are emphatic about being Jewish. "I love my people," a Lemba woman told Parfitt, "we came from the Israelites, we came from Sena, we crossed the sea . . . We were so beautiful with beautiful long, Jewish noses and so proud of our facial structure. We no way wanted to spoil our structure by carelessness, eating pig or marrying non-Lemba gentiles." The Lemba maintain that their traditions are of Jewish origin. Their flag features a Star of David and the Elephant of Judah. They practice circumcision. They bury their dead in accordance with Jewish traditions. They hold the first day of the new moon sacred, shaving their heads to commemorate it. The Lemba do not eat meat from pigs; only circumcised men may sacrifice animals for food. Women must purify themselves ritually after menstruating or giving birth. Though non-Lemba women are allowed to marry into the tribe, Lemba men face expulsion if they marry gentiles.

Jesus instructed his disciples to continue spreading his doctrine until one would come to finish what he started. He instructed his disciples to go seek out and find “the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel, the Tribe of Judah only.”

Matthew 10:5 - 6= “These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

Matthew 15:24   “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

According to John 9:22 Yashu’a “Jesus” said “the Tribe of Judah” (as they interpret it as Jews, a name first used in 1514 A.D.) “will be cast out of the synagogue.” It (Jew) is not in the real Bible. The first time you see it in your newly translated Bible is Esther 2:5 and you won’t find God anywhere in that book.”

ESTHER 2:5  “Now in Shushan the palace there was a certain Jew, whose name was Mordecai, the son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of Kish, a Benjamite;”

Excerpted from Luke The Physician (Pamphlet No. 3) by Dr. Malachi Z. York-El
Related: Jew or Groupie?

We also have the views of some modern critical scholars with regard to this subject. These modern scholars disagree about the relative significance of color terms in the biblical text.  This is because a SPELL has been put on a large segment of the World’s population. This Spell is “RELIGION”, which is the cause of much ignorance, bloodshed and war!.

     This concept that all people in the Bible were Caucasians is a Spell based on misinterpretation and mistranslation of the Scriptures called Torah, Injil and Quran (Moseism, Christism and Mohammedism)   Then misinterpretation and mistranslation of the Bible  leads the Ignorant to believe that there are no black peoples, no Asian peoples mentioned in the Bible. That the Bible writers had no knowledge of what we might call Asian or Negroid peoples.  Some scholars suppose that Asians and Blacks were unknown to biblical writers. This is where we are. This is what makes our challenge very difficult. However, there clearly exists in Judeo-Christian history various traditions regarding the origin of Black people.

Ethiopian Ocean

“At one time, all Africa and the nearby surrounding lands, before the parting of Africa from Asia and other territories, were called “Ethiopia” or Ether-Utopia (Genesis 2:13). Kuwsh, called Kish in pre-Bible time, is now El Habasha and the Atlantic Ocean was called the Ethiopian Ocean.

There is only one ocean and many landmasses. Before the separation of the land due to explosions and continental drift, the masses were all one, called Ganawa”.

Source:  Breaking The Spell on Blacks , Rev. Dr. Malachi Z. York

1.      The pre-Adamite view says that blacks, particularly so-called Negroes, are not descended from Adam. This is a very powerful statement.

This may be proven by the Book of Genesis 6:2 – 4:

“That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

 3And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

 4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.”

WHO WERE THESE “SONS OF GOD”? 

We have shown in previous “BIBLE MASTERY LESSONS” that Blacks are the First born and Ancient of Days. This in and of itself makes them “The Children of God” or “The Sons Of God”.  Accept it or leave it alone! Truth is Truth.

   So Black was First on all levels!

The Lord is Darkness

Black is God. God is good. Black is good. Pa Neter "the Supreme Being" called God was in blackness or darkness:

Amos 5:18 - "Woe unto you that desire the day of the LORD! to what end is it for you? the day of the LORD is darkness, and not light."

He said, in Genesis 1:3, "let there be light." So, God dwelled in darkeness, and dwells there now. Light is chaos.

Source:  Breaking The Spell On The Blacks , Rev. Dr. Malachi York

Evidence in the Bible

Let’s look at some evidence for black presence in the Bible. Here’s the evidence. Here’s what makes the argument. There are traditions of Cain and his descendants through Ham being black. Rabbinical writings, Jewish writings attribute blackness to Ham. Again you’ve heard the arguments of why that’s not always accepted, but let’s take it as a piece, just a piece of evidence that rabbis writing all during the second testament period identified Cain, Ham and all of their relatives as people of color, as black.

Second piece of evidence: Considering geographic locations of people groups mentioned in the Bible. The Hamites mentioned in Genesis 10:6 the Bible locates in Africa, Central Africa and in Asia in what today we’d probably call India, Malaysia, that general part of the world. What would we find there today and what does history tell us of the peoples who have inhabited Central Africa and parts of southern Asia? They have been and are black. So geographically, the Bible places these people with the name black, with the tradition of being black, in geographical regions which historically we see even to this day have traditionally been the abode of black people. There was a land of Ham in Canaan and the designation of Egypt as the tents and land of Ham. There’s the location of Ethiopia and Egypt all of which are referred to biblically in terms that reflect people who are black. The name Cush/Kush/Kuwsh from the Hebrew when it was carried over into Greek became “Ethiopia” which means black people. We even have the reference in the book of Jeremiah, . . . can the Ethiopian change his skin?

Jeremiah 13:23
” Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots?  Then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”

Egypt was called Mizraim, another word that some scholars say connects to a certain coloring of being dark or black in the land of Egypt.

Third evidence: Terms, adjectives and proper names indicative of color used in the Bible. For example, Cush is the most common term designating color in reference to persons, people or lands used in the Bible. It’s used fifty-eight (58) times in the King James Version. It is the Hebrew term for black. The Greek and Latin transliteration is Ethiopia. In classical literature, Greek and Roman authors describe Ethiopians as black. Archaeology has found these people to be black. You have Canaan, Put and Mizriam. If you have a New Revised Standard Version and you read Genesis 10 in the